<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 30 May 2012 08:35:41 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Reviews</title><link>http://www.polyideas.com/technology-reviews/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 21:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Windows 7 &amp; Solid State Disks (SSDs)</title><dc:creator>polyideas admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 21:14:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.polyideas.com/technology-reviews/2011/5/29/windows-7-solid-state-disks-ssds.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">586407:10334191:11613905</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The past 18 months have seen Solid State Disk (SSD) drives go from being a strange and expensive curiosity to a very effective way to get a performance boost from your laptop. &nbsp;While these tweaks can be applied to desktop PCs too, my focus will be on laptops. &nbsp;Here's the big benefits of SSDs:</p>
<p><ol>
<li>No moving parts- the hard drive is a sensitive part of your PC and quite susceptible to shock when you smack it on a table or jostle it in a bag when it's still on.</li>
<li>Maintenance intensive. &nbsp;Most folks don't realize that a full day's use or heavy file operations fragment your hard drive by scattering files all over. &nbsp;As a result, you end up with a computer that gradually gets slower and slower. &nbsp;Plus Window's defrag tools really stink- I like Auslogic's tool for my disk drives.</li>
<li>Performance! &nbsp;I know it's listed third, but there's a good reason in this alone to upgrade. &nbsp;Traditional hard disks usually range from 80-120 megabytes per second. &nbsp;A <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004OR0GRC/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=86753090e-20&amp;camp=213381&amp;creative=390973&amp;linkCode=as4&amp;creativeASIN=B004OR0GRC&amp;adid=14EX0F96K12R8MKAK4QT&amp;">good Intel SSD</a> can easily get 450 megabytes read &amp; 200+ megabytes per second on writes. &nbsp;Watch out, there are cheap crappy SSDs out there that perform worse than hard disks.</li>
</ol></p>
<p>The good news is that Windows 7 can take advantage of of SSDs, but not all disks trigger the automatic support in Windows 7. &nbsp;When that happens, it's important to make the few changes to the system. &nbsp;It may seem fine without them, but the changes will make the laptop even faster &amp; keep the disk healthy over time. &nbsp;</p>
<p>One big issue is that Windows wants to defrag your hard drive- clean it up and put all the files together at the beginning of the disk. This is good for older drives but bad for SSDs. &nbsp;SSDs actually run faster when the files are spread all over, so you don't want them lined up together. &nbsp;There are other more technical reasons around the wear of the SSD, but that's for another day.</p>
<p>There are a couple easy things to do if you're not too technical. &nbsp;This this is for you:</p>
<p><ol>
<li>Turn off the task to defrag your hard drive. &nbsp;<ol>
<li>Go to Control Panel-&gt;Administrative Tools-&gt;Task Scheduler</li>
<li>On the left hand side of the screen, expand Task Scheduler Library-&gt;Microsoft-&gt;Windows-&gt;Defrag</li>
<li>In the top center window, right-click the task and select 'Disable'</li>
<li>Close the windows you used to get there.</li>
</ol></li>
<li>Complicated, huh? &nbsp;You can also just <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/3116/tweaktown_s_solid_state_drive_optimization_guide/index5.html">go to this site</a> and <a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=49779">download</a> the tool. &nbsp;I've used this for nearly a year with no troubles.</li>
<li>Go to the manufacturer of your SSD and download &amp; install ALL of their drivers/tools, even if you don't plan to use them. &nbsp;These help add some things in the background.</li>
</ol></p>
<p>If you feel pretty technical, here are a couple more notes for you:</p>
<p>
<ul>
<li>You can disable your pagefile/swap file if you have 8GB or more. &nbsp;You can also just manually set it to 1024MB (both min &amp; max) to keep the rarely-used swap file from eating up expensive SSD space.</li>
<li>RAID of SSDs is mind-blowingly fast, but expensive. &nbsp;You can do disk striping to get breakneck speeds, but you end up losing support for TRIM and other key functions.</li>
<li>Consider moving your MP3s, movies and other large files to a second disk. &nbsp;I replaced my optical drive in one laptop with a traditional hard disk. &nbsp;I park my media files, software installers and other large bits there.</li>
<li>Don't partition the whole disk- with Windows 7 and Bitlocker, there's a performance drop when the whole disk is encrypted. &nbsp;So I manually partition the disk and leave about 500MB free on the main partition.</li>
</ul>
</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyideas.com/technology-reviews/rss-comments-entry-11613905.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>New Yorker for iPad (other digital magazines too)</title><category>Apps</category><category>ipad</category><category>kindle</category><category>magazines</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator>polyideas admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.polyideas.com/technology-reviews/2011/5/10/new-yorker-for-ipad-other-digital-magazines-too.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">586407:10334191:11425585</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The New Yorker</span></strong></p>
<p><span><span>Conde</span> <span>Nast</span>, the publisher of several major magazine properties has released a new app for the <span>iPad</span>. &nbsp;I'll get to the look and feel of the app in a moment, but it's worth noting a major update for the publisher- they announced support for in-app subscription support as well as future support for print subscribers. &nbsp;This is great news if you already paid for a subscription, and provides an easy way to try out the magazines <span>Conde</span> <span>Nast</span> offers without buying a second subscription.</span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/the-new-yorker-magazine/id370614765?mt=8" target="_blank"><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0041.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305087146622" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 150px;">New Yorker sample page</span></span><span>To start, the app is gorgeous. &nbsp;The transitions are terrific, and they have really kept the classy look of the magazine. &nbsp;I had a Kindle subscription to the New Yorker for about a year and loved the writing- but with the Kindle you get only text and the occasional grey image. &nbsp;The New Yorker on the iPad is color and makes great use of the iPad.</span></p>
<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0042.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305087160893" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 150px;">New Yorker article intro</span></span>In the first issue, they also show great variety in the layout and design. &nbsp;They obviously have a great setup for typesetting and page layouts- I didn't see one layout repeated, but they still managed to avoid the sometimes-bewildering layouts that Wired Magazine sometimes delivers.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Other Magazines</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span>It's also worth mentioning that Martha Stewart's iPad magazine app is pretty clever too. &nbsp;They are a little more adventurous with the layouts, but they still deliver a great experience.</span></p>
<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0046.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305086864888" alt="" /></span></span>&nbsp;<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0049.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305086846016" alt="" /></span></span>The Martha Stewart app does a great job of encouraging you to "play" in the app, moving around magazine elements as if they were on train tracks. &nbsp;You can't really mess it up or cover up what you're reading, but you can move the elements that seems to make it more fun.</span></p>
<p><span>Trying out these magazine apps made me wish for more just like them. &nbsp;Both apps do everything just right, although I am not really a big Martha Stewart reader. &nbsp;Wired magazine &amp; GQ magazine are probably my only two cover-to-cover paper subscriptions where I read everything. &nbsp;I have bought a couple of the iPad app versions, but considering my paper subscription to both runs into 2012 or 2013 it's pretty wasteful to drop $5 on each month's release. &nbsp;GQ takes a pretty conservative approach, while Wired seems to want to make everything a video. &nbsp;I know I am tired of a video playing for the cover of the May Wired issue every time I open the issue. &nbsp;What Wired does to look cool and wild in paper translates into annoying videos and page behavior in the app. &nbsp;The good news is that once those things are out of the way, the layout is great there too:</span></p>
<p><span><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0045.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305087457231" alt="" /></span></span>These are all essentially consumer magazines, and looking nifty is the name of the game for them. &nbsp;I am really missing Harvard Business Review in digital form- the Kindle version can't be viewed or downloaded to my iPad, so I read it far less often and don't get the same treatment as these magazines give me. &nbsp;Given the recent flood of magazines, I expect to see HBR as an iPad app in six months tops.</span></p>
<p><span>To me, the last but not least of the new publications is the Bloomberg Business app. &nbsp;These guys have it right- a weekly publication that is free to current subscribers- a first in the app store if I'm not mistaken. &nbsp;They handle video, inteviews with the publishing staff to give some backstory to the week's articles. &nbsp;It's easily an equal on all parts to the print version, and better since it arrives in my mailbox at home after I leave for travel and the iPad version is ready most Monday nights.<span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 150px;" src="http://www.polyideas.com/storage/post-images/IMG_0043.PNG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1305087744802" alt="" /></span></span></span></p>
<p><span>Navigation is also easy and intuitive. &nbsp;I am interested to see if a new standard for layout and behavior will emerge. &nbsp;I'm hoping those annoying carboard inserts don't find their way into the apps though. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p>In summary, there's already a good showing of magazine apps. &nbsp;I sold my first generation iPad after waiting six months for these magazines to emerge. &nbsp;A little more than a year later, we've got some serious progress being made.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.polyideas.com/technology-reviews/rss-comments-entry-11425585.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
